This article by Thomas Lipscomb in The Chicago Sun-Times is fascinating. But, this paragraph near the end may expalin why Senator Kerry does not want to release his miltary records:
What could that more than 100 pages contain? Questions have been raised about President Bush's drill attendance in the reserves, but Bush received his honorable discharge on schedule. Kerry, who should have been discharged from the Navy about the same time -- July 1, 1972 -- wasn't given the discharge he has on his campaign Web site until July 13, 1978. What delayed the discharge for six years? This raises serious questions about Kerry's performance while in the reserves that are far more potentially damaging than those raised against Bush.
Did the Senator do what he accused President Bush of doing? Did he go AWOL?
Comments